Difference between revisions of "Affranchis"

From TLP
Jump to: navigation, search
m
Line 1: Line 1:
French colonial [[Saint-Domingue]] (now [[Haiti]]) had three social classes: French planters, '''affranchi''' landholders, and African [[slaves]]. The affranchi were light-skinned ([[mulattoes]]) free persons of color, the offspring of white French men and African women. As such, the affranchi had legal and social advantages over the slave classes. They were able to own land and attend some French colonial entertainments. They could not hold administrative posts or work as doctors or lawyers. They were also forbidden to wear the style of clothes favored by the wealthy white colonists. In spite of the disadvantages, many affranchi identified themselves culturally with France rather than with the enslaved population.
+
French colonial [[Saint-Domingue]] (now [[Haiti]]) had three social classes: French planters, '''affranchi''' landholders, and African [[slaves]]. The affranchi were light-skinned ([[mulattoes]]) free persons of color, the offspring of white French men and African women. As such, the affranchi had legal and social advantages over the [[slave]] classes. They were able to own land and attend some French colonial entertainments. They could not hold administrative posts or work as doctors or lawyers. They were also forbidden to wear the style of clothes favored by the wealthy white colonists. In spite of the disadvantages, many affranchi identified themselves culturally with France rather than with the enslaved population.
  
 
Yet many whites detested them. In fact, the term affranchi, meaning "ex-slave" was an insult term, designed to remind wealthy men and women who had been born in freedom that whites considered them still to be ex-slaves, because of their African ancestry. Whites' belief that anything linked with Africa, even by the slightest drop of blood, was abject and debasing and identified with being inferior. [[Mulattoes]] had reasoned that they had to distance themselves from their African roots in an attempt to receive more acceptance from the white colonists. One of their leaders, the indigo planter [[Julien Raimond]], claimed they owned a third of all the slaves in the colony. Many were committed to maintaining [[slavery]] in the early years of the [[French Revolution]] and Haitian Revolution.
 
Yet many whites detested them. In fact, the term affranchi, meaning "ex-slave" was an insult term, designed to remind wealthy men and women who had been born in freedom that whites considered them still to be ex-slaves, because of their African ancestry. Whites' belief that anything linked with Africa, even by the slightest drop of blood, was abject and debasing and identified with being inferior. [[Mulattoes]] had reasoned that they had to distance themselves from their African roots in an attempt to receive more acceptance from the white colonists. One of their leaders, the indigo planter [[Julien Raimond]], claimed they owned a third of all the slaves in the colony. Many were committed to maintaining [[slavery]] in the early years of the [[French Revolution]] and Haitian Revolution.

Revision as of 12:55, 18 March 2006

French colonial Saint-Domingue (now Haiti) had three social classes: French planters, affranchi landholders, and African slaves. The affranchi were light-skinned (mulattoes) free persons of color, the offspring of white French men and African women. As such, the affranchi had legal and social advantages over the slave classes. They were able to own land and attend some French colonial entertainments. They could not hold administrative posts or work as doctors or lawyers. They were also forbidden to wear the style of clothes favored by the wealthy white colonists. In spite of the disadvantages, many affranchi identified themselves culturally with France rather than with the enslaved population.

Yet many whites detested them. In fact, the term affranchi, meaning "ex-slave" was an insult term, designed to remind wealthy men and women who had been born in freedom that whites considered them still to be ex-slaves, because of their African ancestry. Whites' belief that anything linked with Africa, even by the slightest drop of blood, was abject and debasing and identified with being inferior. Mulattoes had reasoned that they had to distance themselves from their African roots in an attempt to receive more acceptance from the white colonists. One of their leaders, the indigo planter Julien Raimond, claimed they owned a third of all the slaves in the colony. Many were committed to maintaining slavery in the early years of the French Revolution and Haitian Revolution.

See also

Reference